Tag Archive for Wine

The Quini App and My Changing Wine Reviews

Shortly before I headed out to the 2014 Wine Bloggers Conference (WBC14), I agreed to watch a demo of the new Quini app with Roger Noueim, the company’s CEO. Excepting the occasionally slow search functions, it works beautifully on iPhone, iPad, and the desktop. I’m mostly using a beta version for Android, which is much, much buggier than the released versions of Quini I already listed, but that’s why it’s still in beta, right?

Regardless, I loved what I saw because Quini’s distinctive floral imagery offered me a new way of looking at wine reviews, literally.

The petals each represent a different aspect of wine appreciation: eye, nose, mouth, finish, and the overall opinion of the wine. Height represents how high the user scores that aspect and width represents how much character that aspect has.

In other words, you wouldn’t necessarily want full petals if you’re looking for easy drinking or light summer wines, but you should probably be wary of short and stubby petals no matter your goal. The desktop version allows users to rate the wines in much greater detail than the mobile app, but I use my phone because there’s something so satisfying about the tactile nature of shaping the petals.

The final floral image is unique for every wine you taste, and so is the final score in that little right-hand corner. I find that score a truer reflection of the wine than gauging the Parker point system, which starts at 50, a practice that always throws me off. Quini reviews can score anywhere from 0-100, so a score in the middle ranges doesn’t indicate a poor wine, just an average one. I assure you this 2010 Proprietor’s Reserve Zinfandel from Maryhill was anything *but* average at the 78 points I gave it.

maryhill quini

For Quini, scoring in the 70s is great! I also like the variety of ways Quini displays their reviews. Some highlight the individual flavors tasted in the wine and others only show the petals.

quini sample

My recent use of Quini has contributed to a realization I’ve made about my own wine reviews—I’m done focusing on a wine’s notes in my writing. Quini’s graphics will summarize all that well enough on their own. I hesitate to add them to my reviews only because Quini’s built-in categories aren’t as comprehensive as I’d like. For example, there are a lot more ways for a wine to taste earthy than “dust”, “forest floor”, and “mushroom”. But I can point out any significant flavors Quini doesn’t have listed in the rest of my review, so that’s not really a problem.

With Quini handling the flavor profile, my posts will shift from listing flavors to using metaphors to paint a fuller picture of the wine. Aiming to submerge the reader in an experience is not an unexpected move for a fiction writer like myself, I suppose, but I was honestly surprised to realize how much more effective I find fanciful wine reviews than reviews focused entirely on physical characteristics. At the WBC14, Marcy Gordon of Come for the Wine grabbed me with this tweeted review during the Ballard AVA Syrah session:

I can so easily imagine the sleek rebellion I’d feel pulling on that slip, or drinking the wine as the case may be. It’s Creative Writing 101, really, but in the past, I’ve approached wine reviews more clinically. Being new to wine appreciation, I felt the need to learn and respect the boundaries of someone else’s field, if you will. But after a great conversation on using Quini in wine reviews with Kayla Koroush-Lewis, the Barrel Thief, this past Saturday, and reading inspiring, imaginative reviews from my fellow wine bloggers, I think I’m ready to leave the recitation of tasting notes behind and move on to describing the experience of drinking wine, incorporating whatever sensations or imagery a glass of wine may bring to mind. Listing spices and fruits is no longer exciting for me, and thus it can’t be vivid for you to read, either.

Is this a big change? No. But to me, it signifies both my growth as a wine appreciator (I can taste different fruits, spices, oak, etc., with confidence!) and a recognition that the growth I want to pursue isn’t in training my palate further (I don’t care to tell the difference between a 12% or 13% ABV bottle with a sip). I’d rather more effectively relay to my readers the thrill or misery of drinking each wine, not just the flavors it recalls. I want that sensory impression to linger long enough for you to pick up your own bottle, and “bathing in moonlight underneath wisteria boughs” is going to stick around a lot longer than “floral with a pleasant mouthfeel.”

Again, I am a fiction writer. That difference should have been way more obvious to me. I’m shamed that it wasn’t.

sad wine becca

Shamed…with a mimosa.

As I post new reviews, let me know what you think of Quini’s profiles and my plunges into imagery-filled wine reviewing. Your feedback is always welcome.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

2010 Silvertip Petit Pinot Noir

2010 Silvertip Petit Pinot Noir
Santa Cruz Mountains, California

Silvertip Petit Pinot

Another wine I picked up from April’s Passport Days, Silvertip’s petit pinot noir surprised me by pleasing my palate more than their regular pinot noir. Typically, I find wines primarily made of petit varietals too tight and tart to be truly enjoyable. But this bottle’s the exception that proves the rule.

The nose is concentrated cinnamon and cardamom with notes of rose, plum, sandalwood, and cherry. Its flavors are layered well while drinking, though the wine does need to air out for a while. I found it too tart right after opening, as it gave me a Sourpatch Kid impression. But it mellows out to plum with lime, vanilla, sandalwood, and faint cantaloupe. Chocolate and leather see the sip out.

I’m rather surprised I don’t taste any of the spice I smelled, but I’m happy with this flavor profile. With aging, and/or longer airing time, it could be fantastic.


Other Bloggers’ Thoughts

There are some reviews out there for Silvertip’s pinot noir, but not the petit pinot noir. So you’re stuck with my opinion for now!

Reviewed 31 May 14.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

WBC14: My Thoughts on the Wine Bloggers Conference

It’s been a little over a week since I returned home from the Wine Bloggers Conference in Buellton (WBC14), and I’ve had enough time to form some opinions on the experience. Overwhelmingly, those opinions are good, and they come from the perspective of a first-time attendee who didn’t entirely know what to expect from the event.

Did not expect ultrasound oxidation!

Did not expect ultrasound oxidation!

Did expect plenty of this.

Did expect plenty of this.

I wouldn’t qualify my experience as negative in any way. My thinky thoughts are more about defining what sort of wine writer I am and considering whether that fits into the WBC’s intended audience or not.

1. Value

The conference was run by Zephyr Adventures, which as their website rightfully claims, “specialize[s] in providing our travelers with big experiences from a small company at a fair price.” That company description exactly sums up my overall opinion of the conference. If nothing else, WBC14 offered two and a half days’ worth of unending wine tastings, two meals a day–

Fare at the Wine Blogger Awards dinner.

Fare at the Wine Blogger Awards dinner.

–the chance to get to know other wine writers and a bevy of industry professionals, and an afternoon spent at the Sanford Winery nestled in the Sta. Rita Hills AVA all for $100 for citizen bloggers like myself.

Next, add in the amazing value of the multiple excursions the conference put together. I attended the Bridlewood excursion for only $15, and we enjoyed a large picnic lunch at the winery’s immensely scenic grounds—


–tastings of their wines with the meal, and a panel of local food producers that resulted in yes, more food and wine.

Read more →

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather